data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8326c/8326c7d947a13d97f95141f012b03c05f7e8cac6" alt=""
San Diego, California, 10 or 12 years ago: A group of us were going to dinner, and we planned to meet at the bar near the pool. I ordered a bottle of beer and lit up a smoke. I asked the bartender for an ashtray, and he looked at me as if I were from Mars. "You can't smoke in here!" he said.
That was my first experience with the anti-smoking hysteria that has taken over this country. I do not dispute that cigarettes are not good for you, and I believe that people should be able to enjoy a smoke-free environment. What I do not believe is that the government has the right to tell a business owner -- particularly a bar owner -- that he or she cannot allow smoking in their establishment.
About four years ago, the Columbus City Council banned smoking in virtually all public places in our fair city. Some suburbs followed suit, but not all. So you had a situation in which it was possible to smoke in a bar on Olentangy River Road, but not in a bar a half mile away on 5th Avenue.
Since then, the entire state has gone smokeless, so no bar has any advantage over any other bar.
No one has ever been forced to patronize a bar, and no one has ever been forced to work at a bar. The do-gooders who promoted the smoking ban claimed that people wanted smoke-free bars. Fair enough. If the demand was there, all one had to do was open such a bar, and see what kind of business it would do. Then people could make their choices about which bar they wanted to patronize, and the property rights of all bar owners would be protected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f201/0f2014ce634ad6f230bd5b3409f027771ca03cd3" alt=""
This was never a health issue. It is a property rights issue, and property rights are a bedrock of our social and economic way of life. Using the logic of the smoking ban, it is not so far-fetched to envision a day when perfume and cologne are banned in public places. It sounds ridiculous to even suggest such a thing, but the same could have been said for a smoking ban 20 years ago.
UPDATE: Found this little gem the day after original post. From 1992 (and no surprise, it's California):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd664/cd664c5c40c1c06f07f7425a269dbf44daa05d3c" alt=""