Wednesday, January 20, 2010

The Games People Play


Some tidbits about games...

The earliest known example of a game is a complete set of equipment for the Royal Game of Ur, dating to about 3000 BC. The Royal Game of Ur can be thought of as a precursor to Backgammon, and it was played with a precursor to dice. The earliest record of cubical dice is from 700 BC, so we must surmise that the people who played the Royal Game of Ur probably used 4-sided sticks to determine their moves. It's a good thing that cubical dice were invented - otherwise, most cars south of the Mason-Dixon line would sport a set of fuzzy sticks on their rear-view mirrors.

For the next 2,000 years or so, that was about all there was to play. Then one day, some guy in India came up with chess. This was a quantum leap from the Game of Ur, and chess quickly spread throughout Asia Minor. Chess is not a difficult game to learn, but it may be the most difficult of any game to master. The number of possible moves runs into the quintillions, and my feeble mind can't remember all those moves. But I still like to play.

Around the middle of the 15th century, the French, not having sufficient intellect to play chess, invented the standard four-suited deck of cards that we still use today. That led inexorably to the invention of the casino, where you won't find a single chessboard. For the French, this was a simple concept - all you needed to open a casino was a table, a deck of cards, and some cubical dice. I suspect they left it to the people in India to figure out the various odds for their casino games. This is not to say that the French invented the casino, for they did not. An invention like that required more creativity than could be found in France. But they needed a place to drink their wine, and what better place than a felt-covered table, complete with rails to prevent one from falling to the floor.


I recently discovered a new game: KenKen. This is no joke - it is a real game, invented just a few years ago, and can be found in the NY Times and many other dailies. It is similar to Sudoku in that it is played on a grid (as small as 4x4 and as large as 9x9), and that each row and column has no repeating numbers. In a 6x6 game, for example, each row will contain the numbers one through six, as will each column. The difference between KenKen and Sudoku is that there is some math involved with KenKen. What this means in practice is that you have to logically determine the possibilities before you can logically determine the possibilities...a wonderful concept.

Rather than me trying to explain it, follow this link to the KenKen page, where you can print off puzzles and learn the ropes. You can also read Will Shortz' assessment of the game - and if Will Shortz likes it, it is probably worth a look. (He's the guy who edits the NY Times crossword puzzles and who has tempted more than one cruciverbalist to jump out the window.) The game is beautiful in its simplicity, yet devilish in its deceptions. If you can think logically, give it a go.






One of these drawings is logical, the other is not.

Can you tell the difference?

8 comments:

rhymeswithplague said...

Did we get up on the wrong side of bed today? A shot at Southerners and a shot at Frenchmen in the same post.

The first cartoon seems logical (If a blind man with an axe comes looking for a turkey to kill and you are a turkey, pretend to be a cow).

I can't make heads or tails of the second cartoon. Unless it means what you listen to eventually has an effect, usually for the worse.

I'm not good at these sorts of puzzles and games.

Sam said...

Nothing personal, Rhymes! I didn't know you were French!
But seriously, what would humor be without the French??
I have no idea what the second cartoon is about either...

Yorkshire Pudding said...

Of course your post entirely ignores all the many fun games that men have played with women through the millennia such as "The Sermon on the Mount", "Moby Dick" and "Hunt The Thimble". Perhaps such games have not yet reached the backwoods of Ohio.
P.S. Brague is obviously a French name! "Les bragues" = a pair of lacy knickers traditionally made in Chantilly, near Paris and facvoured by can-can dancers.

rhymeswithplague said...

Perhaps the second cartoon's meaning, if there is one, is that people who listen to all the propaganda that they are victims can no longer recognize a real victim, or if they do, they are unable to help real victims because of their own supposed victimization -- and all because of swallowing the propaganda.

How's that for an interpretation?

And it could even be considered "logical"....

I am not French that I know of, although the spelling of my name would suggest otherwise. My Dad always said the name was Welsh, but I fantasized that it had come over to the British Isles at the time of the Norman Conquest, with that spelling. Then, a few years ago, I learned that there is a river-slash-vacation-spot in France called La Brague. How about that?!! So maybe I am French after all. Except that Mr. Brague, it turns out, was not my birth father. So there you go.

Am I making any sense at all?

I fear not.

But I don't have to Southern (I'm not) or French (I'm not) to rush to their defense!

rhymeswithplague said...

I suppose it would help to know what the cartoon guy is saying in Chinese....

rhymeswithplague said...

"to Southern" -> "to be Southern.

I've never thought of myself as a pair of lacy knickers favored by can-can dancers before, but it is darned intriguing, and does wonders for my libido....

Kate said...

I bet, I absolutely BET none of you will guess my background! :o)

And my nom de blog won't help you either.

Kate said...

YP, you definitely need some more passion in your life.

Or less. Perhaps it's spilling over the top.